tin electrodes (electro cap international)
Structured Review
![Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show <t>electrodes/timepoints</t> significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0582/pmc12100582/pmc12100582__PSYP-62-e70074-g001.jpg)
Tin Electrodes, supplied by electro cap international, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/pmc12100582-133-5-12?v=electro+cap+international
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study"
Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study
Journal: Psychophysiology
doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074
Figure Legend Snippet: Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Significant effects elicited by the Concreteness ×Task[SEM] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The raster diagram (left) shows electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the interaction. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. The topoplots (middle panels) show the t values (same color scale as the raster diagram) averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plots (right panels) depict the LMM estimated responses for the highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) concreteness in the semantic task for the electrodes indicated as black dots in the corresponding topoplots (i.e., CPz, FC2, and TP9, respectively). Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Significant effect elicited by the Concreteness × Task[AFF] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The topoplot (left panel) shows the t values averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plot (right panel) depicts the LMM estimated responses for highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) Concreteness values in the valence task for the CPz electrode indicated as a black dot in the topoplot. Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Representational similarity analysis results. The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints with significant EEG‐model representational similarities for the model indicated in the corresponding heading. Gray rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant EEG‐model representational similarities were observed. VAD, Valence‐Arousal‐Dominance space; WEISS, word‐embeddings Italian semantic space; Levenshtein distance for orthographic similarity; see Figure for other conventions.
Techniques Used:
