Review




Structured Review

electro cap international tin electrodes
Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show <t>electrodes/timepoints</t> significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.
Tin Electrodes, supplied by electro cap international, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/pmc12100582-133-5-12?v=electro+cap+international
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tin electrodes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study"

Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study

Journal: Psychophysiology

doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074

Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.
Figure Legend Snippet: Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.

Techniques Used:

Significant effects elicited by the Concreteness ×Task[SEM] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The raster diagram (left) shows electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the interaction. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. The topoplots (middle panels) show the t values (same color scale as the raster diagram) averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plots (right panels) depict the LMM estimated responses for the highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) concreteness in the semantic task for the electrodes indicated as black dots in the corresponding topoplots (i.e., CPz, FC2, and TP9, respectively). Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure Legend Snippet: Significant effects elicited by the Concreteness ×Task[SEM] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The raster diagram (left) shows electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the interaction. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. The topoplots (middle panels) show the t values (same color scale as the raster diagram) averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plots (right panels) depict the LMM estimated responses for the highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) concreteness in the semantic task for the electrodes indicated as black dots in the corresponding topoplots (i.e., CPz, FC2, and TP9, respectively). Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Techniques Used:

Significant effect elicited by the Concreteness × Task[AFF] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The topoplot (left panel) shows the t values averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plot (right panel) depicts the LMM estimated responses for highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) Concreteness values in the valence task for the CPz electrode indicated as a black dot in the topoplot. Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure Legend Snippet: Significant effect elicited by the Concreteness × Task[AFF] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The topoplot (left panel) shows the t values averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plot (right panel) depicts the LMM estimated responses for highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) Concreteness values in the valence task for the CPz electrode indicated as a black dot in the topoplot. Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Techniques Used:

Representational similarity analysis results. The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints with significant EEG‐model representational similarities for the model indicated in the corresponding heading. Gray rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant EEG‐model representational similarities were observed. VAD, Valence‐Arousal‐Dominance space; WEISS, word‐embeddings Italian semantic space; Levenshtein distance for orthographic similarity; see Figure for other conventions.
Figure Legend Snippet: Representational similarity analysis results. The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints with significant EEG‐model representational similarities for the model indicated in the corresponding heading. Gray rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant EEG‐model representational similarities were observed. VAD, Valence‐Arousal‐Dominance space; WEISS, word‐embeddings Italian semantic space; Levenshtein distance for orthographic similarity; see Figure for other conventions.

Techniques Used:



Similar Products

86
Geomatec Co Ltd transparent electrode indium tin oxide ito thin film
Transparent Electrode Indium Tin Oxide Ito Thin Film, supplied by Geomatec Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/us12655347-314-17-34?v=Geomatec+Co+Ltd
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transparent electrode indium tin oxide ito thin film - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences indium tin oxide (ito) electrode thin film
Indium Tin Oxide (Ito) Electrode Thin Film, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/us12338239-221-7-23?v=Corning+Life+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
indium tin oxide (ito) electrode thin film - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
VisionTek Systems LLC indium tin oxide electrodes
A. Schematic of the key brain regions involved in olfactory learning: a mushroom body (MB), paired-anterior-medial (PAM) neurons, paired-posterior-lateral 1 (PPL1) neurons, the antenna and ORNs are shown. The shock and odor icons indicate the stimuli used in the experiment. B. Schematic of the MOT chamber showing odors (OCT and MCH), air flow with air puffs, infrared LEDs for imaging, and glass <t>electrodes</t> for shock. C1. The anti-OCT training paradigm: Flies (n=6-8) were loaded into chambers and tested for OCT and MCH preference (Bias check), then exposed to OCT with a foot shock (Train 1), MCH exposure without a shock (Train 2), agitated with an air puff, and finally re-tested for odor preference (Test). C2. The anti-MCH training protocol: as for the paradigm in C1, except that MCH was paired with a foot shock (Train 1). D1. Paired plot showing the chamber preference index (PI) before and after conditioning. The ends of the orange and blue lines indicate the PI scores per chamber for MCH and OCT training, respectively; black dots indicate the mean PI, and the error bars represent 95% CIs. D2. Change in chamber preference index (ΔPI) between pre- and post-conditioning is shown. The orange and blue triangles indicate the individual pre:post ΔPI values; black dots indicate mean ΔPI values with their 95% CI (black line), and the Δ distributions (gray curve).
Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes, supplied by VisionTek Systems LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/bio_rxiv__2025__06__11__659083-49-26-32?v=VisionTek+Systems+LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
indium tin oxide electrodes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Beneq Inc tin electrode layers
A. Schematic of the key brain regions involved in olfactory learning: a mushroom body (MB), paired-anterior-medial (PAM) neurons, paired-posterior-lateral 1 (PPL1) neurons, the antenna and ORNs are shown. The shock and odor icons indicate the stimuli used in the experiment. B. Schematic of the MOT chamber showing odors (OCT and MCH), air flow with air puffs, infrared LEDs for imaging, and glass <t>electrodes</t> for shock. C1. The anti-OCT training paradigm: Flies (n=6-8) were loaded into chambers and tested for OCT and MCH preference (Bias check), then exposed to OCT with a foot shock (Train 1), MCH exposure without a shock (Train 2), agitated with an air puff, and finally re-tested for odor preference (Test). C2. The anti-MCH training protocol: as for the paradigm in C1, except that MCH was paired with a foot shock (Train 1). D1. Paired plot showing the chamber preference index (PI) before and after conditioning. The ends of the orange and blue lines indicate the PI scores per chamber for MCH and OCT training, respectively; black dots indicate the mean PI, and the error bars represent 95% CIs. D2. Change in chamber preference index (ΔPI) between pre- and post-conditioning is shown. The orange and blue triangles indicate the individual pre:post ΔPI values; black dots indicate mean ΔPI values with their 95% CI (black line), and the Δ distributions (gray curve).
Tin Electrode Layers, supplied by Beneq Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/pm40497867-129-1-8?v=Beneq+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tin electrode layers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
electro cap international tin electrodes
Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show <t>electrodes/timepoints</t> significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.
Tin Electrodes, supplied by electro cap international, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tin+electrodes/pmc12100582-133-5-12?v=electro+cap+international
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tin electrodes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A. Schematic of the key brain regions involved in olfactory learning: a mushroom body (MB), paired-anterior-medial (PAM) neurons, paired-posterior-lateral 1 (PPL1) neurons, the antenna and ORNs are shown. The shock and odor icons indicate the stimuli used in the experiment. B. Schematic of the MOT chamber showing odors (OCT and MCH), air flow with air puffs, infrared LEDs for imaging, and glass electrodes for shock. C1. The anti-OCT training paradigm: Flies (n=6-8) were loaded into chambers and tested for OCT and MCH preference (Bias check), then exposed to OCT with a foot shock (Train 1), MCH exposure without a shock (Train 2), agitated with an air puff, and finally re-tested for odor preference (Test). C2. The anti-MCH training protocol: as for the paradigm in C1, except that MCH was paired with a foot shock (Train 1). D1. Paired plot showing the chamber preference index (PI) before and after conditioning. The ends of the orange and blue lines indicate the PI scores per chamber for MCH and OCT training, respectively; black dots indicate the mean PI, and the error bars represent 95% CIs. D2. Change in chamber preference index (ΔPI) between pre- and post-conditioning is shown. The orange and blue triangles indicate the individual pre:post ΔPI values; black dots indicate mean ΔPI values with their 95% CI (black line), and the Δ distributions (gray curve).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Entirely synthetic memory inception via dual optogenetic activation of sensory and dopaminergic neurons

doi: 10.1101/2025.06.11.659083

Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Schematic of the key brain regions involved in olfactory learning: a mushroom body (MB), paired-anterior-medial (PAM) neurons, paired-posterior-lateral 1 (PPL1) neurons, the antenna and ORNs are shown. The shock and odor icons indicate the stimuli used in the experiment. B. Schematic of the MOT chamber showing odors (OCT and MCH), air flow with air puffs, infrared LEDs for imaging, and glass electrodes for shock. C1. The anti-OCT training paradigm: Flies (n=6-8) were loaded into chambers and tested for OCT and MCH preference (Bias check), then exposed to OCT with a foot shock (Train 1), MCH exposure without a shock (Train 2), agitated with an air puff, and finally re-tested for odor preference (Test). C2. The anti-MCH training protocol: as for the paradigm in C1, except that MCH was paired with a foot shock (Train 1). D1. Paired plot showing the chamber preference index (PI) before and after conditioning. The ends of the orange and blue lines indicate the PI scores per chamber for MCH and OCT training, respectively; black dots indicate the mean PI, and the error bars represent 95% CIs. D2. Change in chamber preference index (ΔPI) between pre- and post-conditioning is shown. The orange and blue triangles indicate the individual pre:post ΔPI values; black dots indicate mean ΔPI values with their 95% CI (black line), and the Δ distributions (gray curve).

Article Snippet: Briefly, it is conducted using an apparatus comprising eight chambers (50 × 5 × 1.3 mm) with acrylic walls, a glass floor and ceilings printed with transparent indium tin oxide electrodes (ITO; Visiontek UK).

Techniques: Imaging

Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.

Journal: Psychophysiology

Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study

doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of univariate EEG analysis (lmeEEG). The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the effect indicated in the corresponding heading. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. Electrodes are on the y axis and are arranged to approximate scalp topography, with top‐to‐bottom corresponding to anterior‐to‐posterior (see Figure 4 for the labels). The x axis represents time in milliseconds from stimulus presentation. The colorbar on the right indicates t‐ values. “:”, interaction; AoA, age of acquisition; Aro, arousal; Con, concreteness; IRT, inverted response time; OLD20, orthographic Levenshtein distance 20; Task[AFF], contrast between the grammatical and the affective tasks; Task[SEM], contrast between the grammatical and the semantic tasks; Val, valence.

Article Snippet: EEG was recorded from 58 tin electrodes mounted on an elastic cap (ElectroCap) according to the 10–10 International System, and seven additional electrodes applied below each eye (IO1, IO2), in the external canthus of each eye (F9, F10), on the nasion (Nz), and on the mastoids .

Techniques:

Significant effects elicited by the Concreteness ×Task[SEM] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The raster diagram (left) shows electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the interaction. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. The topoplots (middle panels) show the t values (same color scale as the raster diagram) averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plots (right panels) depict the LMM estimated responses for the highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) concreteness in the semantic task for the electrodes indicated as black dots in the corresponding topoplots (i.e., CPz, FC2, and TP9, respectively). Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Journal: Psychophysiology

Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study

doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074

Figure Lengend Snippet: Significant effects elicited by the Concreteness ×Task[SEM] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The raster diagram (left) shows electrodes/timepoints significantly modulated by the interaction. White rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant modulations were observed. The topoplots (middle panels) show the t values (same color scale as the raster diagram) averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plots (right panels) depict the LMM estimated responses for the highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) concreteness in the semantic task for the electrodes indicated as black dots in the corresponding topoplots (i.e., CPz, FC2, and TP9, respectively). Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Article Snippet: EEG was recorded from 58 tin electrodes mounted on an elastic cap (ElectroCap) according to the 10–10 International System, and seven additional electrodes applied below each eye (IO1, IO2), in the external canthus of each eye (F9, F10), on the nasion (Nz), and on the mastoids .

Techniques:

Significant effect elicited by the Concreteness × Task[AFF] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The topoplot (left panel) shows the t values averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plot (right panel) depicts the LMM estimated responses for highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) Concreteness values in the valence task for the CPz electrode indicated as a black dot in the topoplot. Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Journal: Psychophysiology

Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study

doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074

Figure Lengend Snippet: Significant effect elicited by the Concreteness × Task[AFF] interaction in target‐locked EEG. The topoplot (left panel) shows the t values averaged in the indicated time windows. The trace‐plot (right panel) depicts the LMM estimated responses for highest (orange dotted line) and lowest (blue solid line) Concreteness values in the valence task for the CPz electrode indicated as a black dot in the topoplot. Error bands indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Article Snippet: EEG was recorded from 58 tin electrodes mounted on an elastic cap (ElectroCap) according to the 10–10 International System, and seven additional electrodes applied below each eye (IO1, IO2), in the external canthus of each eye (F9, F10), on the nasion (Nz), and on the mastoids .

Techniques:

Representational similarity analysis results. The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints with significant EEG‐model representational similarities for the model indicated in the corresponding heading. Gray rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant EEG‐model representational similarities were observed. VAD, Valence‐Arousal‐Dominance space; WEISS, word‐embeddings Italian semantic space; Levenshtein distance for orthographic similarity; see Figure for other conventions.

Journal: Psychophysiology

Article Title: Fine‐Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study

doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representational similarity analysis results. The raster diagrams show electrodes/timepoints with significant EEG‐model representational similarities for the model indicated in the corresponding heading. Gray rectangles indicate electrodes/time points for which no significant EEG‐model representational similarities were observed. VAD, Valence‐Arousal‐Dominance space; WEISS, word‐embeddings Italian semantic space; Levenshtein distance for orthographic similarity; see Figure for other conventions.

Article Snippet: EEG was recorded from 58 tin electrodes mounted on an elastic cap (ElectroCap) according to the 10–10 International System, and seven additional electrodes applied below each eye (IO1, IO2), in the external canthus of each eye (F9, F10), on the nasion (Nz), and on the mastoids .

Techniques: